Ai Coding · Tool profile

GitHub Copilot

Coding assistance and agent workflows within GitHub and supported editors.

Plan at a glance

Plans & sources ↓
Starting plan
Free
Includes
See the plan limits below.
Limits & source scope

Current individual plans meter model usage with AI credits. Model multipliers apply to the legacy request system, including eligible existing annual subscriptions. Organization policy can disable features.

Selected source read 2026-10-20

What does GitHub Copilot cost?

GitHub lists individual Pro at USD $10/month, Pro+ at USD $39/month and Max at USD $100/month, all monthly billing. Free includes 2,000 code completions per month and limited AI credits; the source does not give a fixed Free credit amount in this table.

Public individual plans in USD · checked 28 October 2026
Individual planMonthly billingAI credits: base + flex
FreeUSD $0Limited credits, amount unspecified here; auto model selection only.
ProUSD $10/person/month1,000 + 500 = 1,500/month
Pro+USD $39/person/month3,900 + 3,100 = 7,000/month
MaxUSD $100/person/month10,000 + 10,000 = 20,000/month

Flex allotments can vary. These are credit amounts, not fixed numbers of prompts. Model and token usage determine consumption; one AI credit represents USD $0.01 of usage. Extra usage is separately budgeted. This snapshot excludes organizational plans, annual prices and temporary discounts.

Individual billing and allowances · Copilot plans

Edited by Clinton Feyisitan · Review scope: Selected official pricing and workflow documents read 28 October 2026. Documentation review, not a native product test. Sources and scope.

Download the coding-bill worksheet · Compare these specific plans

Capability sources read 9 October 2026. These are documentation observations; no product test was performed.

Browse & compare tools →

Copilot Projects brings ongoing work into the desktop app

The 28 October desktop update introduces Projects in public preview for ongoing work across repositories or without one. Computer use has separate local-session and permission controls; app access does not establish an included usage allowance. Read the announcement and scope.

Documentation checked 31 October 2026. Earlier plan and test dates are unchanged.

Research scope & testing evidence

New enterprise access model: check the usage bill

GitHub announced a voluntary access model on 28 October for eligible account-team-managed enterprises. Included access does not include metered AI usage. Self-serve subscriptions are unchanged. Read eligibility, seat charges and usage boundaries. Documentation checked 29 October 2026; no account transition tested.

Documentation updates · 28 October 2026

These source reads do not renew subscription prices or hands-on evidence.

How we would evaluate it

Copilot deserves a place on the shortlist when GitHub issues and pull requests already organize the team’s work. Keeping an agent task beside the issue and resulting review can reduce handoff friction. That is different from claiming it produces better code than a separate editor. Check the exact supported editor and organization policy, then compare an identical maintenance task. For a solo developer, the lower individual subscription is useful only if the included allowance covers the work; for a team, central policy and auditability can outweigh a small seat-price difference.

Editorial judgement. This analysis draws from the linked documentation and the workflow described here. It is not a benchmark or a report of using the product.

Fit and limits

Fit and limits

Consider it for

Teams using GitHub issues, pull requests and supported editors.

Check before committing

Current individual plans meter model usage with AI credits. Model multipliers apply to the legacy request system, including eligible existing annual subscriptions. Organization policy can disable features.

What the documentation confirms

What the documentation confirms

  • Documentation includes inline assistance, repository questions, review and assigned agent tasks.
  • Organization settings control feature access.

Source read 9 October 2026. Feature access can depend on plan, region and account.

Earlier pricing observation · 20 October 2026

Price and billing scope

Official pricing ↗

Source read · USD

Public individual monthly plans; official license documentation establishes USD.

  • FreeFree

    Limited chat, agent and CLI usage.

  • ProUSD 10 / month with monthly billing

    AI credits are metered; displayed flex credits may vary.

  • Pro+USD 39 / month with monthly billing

    AI credit allowance differs from Pro.

  • MaxUSD 100 / month with monthly billing

    Higher AI credit allowance; not unlimited paid model usage.

Base and variable flex credit values are not cash fees or permanent quotas. Student, educator and maintainer eligibility is separate. Source receipt.

Which billing system applies?

Current individual plans use AI credits for model usage. The 28 October snapshot above separates base credits from variable flex allotments. Legacy premium-request records are historical context, not a conversion to current prompt allowances.

Current individual billing · Legacy annual-plan scope · Compare billing scopes with Cursor

Recorded editorial criteria

Recorded editorial criteria

These are the previously recorded editorial opinions used in the directory. They have no individually recorded assessment date and were not rescored during this documentation refresh. They are not product-test results.

Historical recorded opinion · equal five-criterion rubric
Functionality8/10
Pricing value9/10
Ease of use10/10
Reliability9/10
Founder fit9/10
How criteria are presented →

Provider update · 14 October 2026

GitHub announced a gradual Argon rollout for Pro+, Max, Business and Enterprise, with provider-list usage billing. Read the announcement scope.

Edited by Clinton Feyisitan · Review scope: official announcement dated 2026-10-13, read 14 October 2026. No account or product workflow was tested. Existing price observations and editorial judgments keep their original dates.

Try one complete task

Assign a small issue with acceptance criteria and inspect the proposed pull request, tests and any files it changed outside the scope.

Create a trial worksheet →

Compare requirements

Edited by Clinton Feyisitan · Evidence policy · Suggest a correction

Related research