Every founder I audit has the same moment. I hand them the stack list, sorted by monthly cost, and ask them to mark what to cut. They stare. Then: "I can't cut any of these. They're all in use." Five minutes later, with a little pressure, they've circled three things. Ten minutes later, six. Thirty minutes later, they've cut 40% of the list and admitted half of them were subscribed-to ghosts of projects that ended eighteen months ago.
The blocker isn't which tools to cut. It's knowing where to start. Everything looks load-bearing until you look at it properly. This essay is a field guide - a kill order that works backwards from the easiest wins to the hardest decisions, so you can recover most of the spend in the first 20 minutes instead of endlessly debating the last 5%.
The kill-order principle
There's a productivity maxim that applies here: don't do hard things when easy things will do. Auditing is the same. Cut the obvious waste before you relitigate the legitimate decisions. Most founders skip tier one and go straight to tier four, then give up when every decision feels painful. The right path is the opposite: sprint through the easy layers, then take on the hard ones with clearer eyes.
Five tiers, in order:
Tools nobody has opened in 60+ days
These are the ghosts. Subscribed, billed monthly, actively forgotten. In any audit, this tier is 15-20% of the stack - tools you signed up for during a project that ended, trials that auto-renewed, tools a departed teammate introduced that nobody else adopted.
How to find them: check last-login timestamps in your password manager. Check your email for "invoice" and "receipt" messages from products nobody mentions in Slack anymore. Check admin consoles for "last active" dates.
Decision: cancel. No debate. If someone needs the tool back later, they'll resubscribe - and that friction is a feature, not a bug. If no one asks in 90 days, the cancellation was correct.
Tools with a clear replacement you already pay for
You pay for Notion and Coda. You pay for Hotjar and PostHog. You pay for Zoom and Google Meet. In every case, one tool is doing the primary work and the other is historical. The audit is when you pick the winner and kill the second.
Common pairings found in the wild:
- GA4 + PostHog / Plausible (pick one website analytics, one product analytics)
- Hotjar + PostHog (PostHog has session replay)
- Dropbox + Google Drive (consolidate - see our switch guide)
- Calendly + Cal.com (Cal.com is cheaper/better for most)
- LaunchDarkly + PostHog (PostHog has feature flags)
- Mailchimp + ConvertKit (pick one ESP)
- Zapier + Make (you don't need both)
Decision: pick the winner, cancel the other. Don't fall into "but it has this one feature..." - that's tier four work. This tier is the 80/20 cut.
Tools you signed up for FOMO reasons
These are harder because they were chosen for real reasons that no longer apply. The classic AI tool gold-rush signups (see The AI Tool Gold Rush). Premium tiers of tools you only use at Free tier capability. Enterprise features you turned on once and forgot to turn off.
Questions to ask each one:
- If I hadn't signed up, would I sign up today? If no, cancel.
- Am I using the paid features specifically, or just the paid tier's version of free features? If the latter, downgrade.
- Is this replacing work I'd actually do, or just feeling like progress? If feeling, cancel.
Decision: downgrade or cancel. Most founders find 5-10 tools in this tier that can be downgraded to free or cancelled entirely.
Tools that are "nice but not needed"
Here it gets uncomfortable. A tool that's legitimately useful, that you legitimately use - but if you're honest, doesn't move the needle. The edit history viewer. The meeting transcription tool used once a month. The specialised analytics dashboard. The third design tool.
Frame it: is the total annual cost of this tool better spent as a part-time freelancer, a paid ads experiment, or a month more of runway? Usually yes. The tool is nice. It's also a tax.
Decision: cut unless it clearly pays back more than it costs. Most nice-to-haves don't survive this test. The ones that do are worth keeping.
Core load-bearing tools
These are the tools that, if they went away, something breaks. Your hosting. Your database. Your billing system. Your primary ESP. Your CRM at scale. Don't cut these; that's not the exercise. Instead, use the audit to renegotiate.
Three renegotiation plays that work:
- Annual billing switch - usually 10-20% discount for prepaying.
- Renewal discount - ask at renewal; often 10-15% off if you threaten to leave.
- Volume negotiation - if you're over a usage tier, ask for custom pricing instead of stacking the next standard tier.
Decision: keep and renegotiate. A clean audit ends with a shortlist of two or three tools to renegotiate at their next renewal date. Easy money.
What usually surprises people
Three patterns show up in almost every audit, and founders are almost always surprised:
The Slack tax. If you're paying Slack for team seats, half the seats are usually inactive (contractors who left, employees who departed, users who never became active). Auditing Slack alone recovers 15-25% of your Slack bill. Do it once a quarter minimum.
The double-CRM problem. Bigger teams frequently discover they have two (or three) CRMs running in parallel. Marketing bought HubSpot. Sales bought Pipedrive or Attio. Customer success bought Intercom as a CRM-adjacent tool. Consolidating is painful but recovers thousands per month.
The Zapier graveyard. Zapier Pro accounts frequently have 30-50% of Zaps disabled, orphaned, or broken and never fixed. You're paying a task tier that assumes all Zaps are live. Audit the Zap list, delete dead ones, and you can usually drop a pricing tier.
Every audit finds the same three patterns because every stack accumulates the same way. Knowing this saves you the "I'm the only one with this problem" moment.
The first 20 minutes matter
If you do the audit in the order above, the first 20 minutes recover most of the savings. Tier 1 and Tier 2 together typically cut 25-35% of the stack. That alone is worth the exercise. Tier 3 and 4 add another 5-15% of savings but take 60-90 minutes of harder thinking.
This matters because audit fatigue is real. If you spend the first hour wrestling with the hardest decisions, you'll run out of steam before you get to the obvious cuts. By going tier-first, you recover the biggest wins early and come to the harder decisions with momentum and some dopamine from the easy kills.
After the cuts
One more thing. Once you've done the audit and cut what's obvious, the meta-move is to set rules that prevent the same bloat from re-accumulating:
- One-in, one-out. New paid tool? Something else is getting cut. Keeps the total count flat.
- No trial without calendar. Every trial you start gets a "decide or cancel" reminder on your calendar before it auto-renews.
- Quarterly audit calendar block. The ritual is the discipline.
- Single owner per tool. If nobody can claim ownership when asked, the tool is dead.
The audit is the cleanup. The rules are what stop you needing another one this size six months from now.
Need help with the first pass?
I'll run the full audit, produce the cut list ranked by tier, and hand you a concrete action plan you can execute in an afternoon.
Get a stack audit →
Further reading
- The Tool Stack Problem - the broader thesis.
- The Quarterly Stack Audit - why the ritual matters.
- The AI Tool Gold Rush - why AI subscriptions especially need cutting.
- How to Audit Your SaaS Stack in 90 Minutes - the practical 6-step framework.
- Switch Guides - when the right cut is "consolidate onto another tool you have."