The two giants of frontend hosting. One is obsessed with Next.js, the other plays nice with everything.
Vercel built Next.js, so naturally their platform is the best place to run it. But if you're using Astro, SvelteKit, Remix, or static sites, Netlify's developer experience is just as good (and often simpler).
Frontend cloud, creators of Next.js
Modern web platform for any framework
| Feature | Vercel | Netlify |
|---|---|---|
| Next.js Support | Perfect, they built it | Good but always catching up |
| Framework Support | All major frameworks | All major frameworks, equal |
| Edge Functions | Edge Runtime + Middleware | Edge Functions (Deno) |
| Serverless Functions | Node.js, Go, Python, Ruby | Node.js, Go |
| Build Speed | Fast, remote caching | Good, improving |
| Deploy Previews | Automatic per PR | Automatic per PR |
| Analytics | Web Vitals + Speed Insights | Basic analytics |
| Forms | Not built-in | Built-in form handling |
| Identity/Auth | Not built-in | Netlify Identity |
| CMS Integration | Works with any headless CMS | Netlify CMS (Decap) |
It really comes down to your framework. If you're using Next.js, Vercel is the obvious choice, they made it, they optimize for it, and the DX is unbeatable. For everything else, Netlify's simplicity, built-in extras (forms, identity), and generous free tier make it the better all-rounder. Both are excellent. You won't regret either choice.
Yes. Vercel created Next.js and their platform is optimised for it, server components, ISR, middleware, and image optimisation all work perfectly out of the box. Netlify supports Next.js too, but new features typically land on Vercel first. If you're all-in on Next.js, Vercel is the obvious choice.
Absolutely. Netlify has a more generous free tier (100GB bandwidth vs Vercel's less), built-in form handling, identity/auth, and better support for static site generators like Hugo and Astro. For anything that isn't Next.js, Netlify is often the simpler, cheaper option.
On free tiers, Netlify is more generous. Paid plans are similar ($19-20/mo per member). The main cost difference comes at scale: Vercel charges for serverless function execution and bandwidth overages. Netlify's pricing is more predictable with higher included limits. For hobby projects, both free tiers are excellent.
Yes. Despite Vercel's association with Next.js, it handles static sites, Astro, SvelteKit, Remix, and other frameworks perfectly well. Deployment is just as simple: connect your Git repo and push. That said, you're not getting any Vercel-specific advantage over Netlify for static hosting.
No. Both have generous free tiers that easily cover personal sites, portfolios, and small projects. Vercel's hobby plan and Netlify's starter plan both include custom domains, HTTPS, and automatic deployments from GitHub. You'd only need to upgrade for team features or high traffic.
Tell us what you are building and we will pick the right tool for you. Or if you are ready to switch, we can help you move without breaking things.
Free. No signup required.
Want someone to choose for you?
Get a Decision Memo (£29) →Personalised recommendation with rationale, based on your use case.
