Databases · Written evaluation

Neon

Managed Postgres with branching, autoscaling and compute metered by active capacity.

Plan at a glance

Plans & sources ↓

100 projects; 100 CU-hours/month per project; 1 GB database storage/project; up to 2 CU compute; unlimited team members.

Limits to check

Paid compute and storage meter from zero; free quotas do not carry into paid plans. History, branches, egress and backend services can add cost.

Official sources read 9 October 2026. The evaluation below is editorial judgement based on documentation; no hands-on product test was performed.

Browse & compare tools →

Research scope & testing evidence

Our evaluation

Neon is a strong candidate when database environments need to follow application development: preview branches, experiments and intermittent workloads are central to the choice. Branching makes a safer workflow possible, but the team must still decide which data can enter a preview and when that branch expires. Autoscaling and scale-to-zero can avoid paying for idle capacity; always-active applications should calculate their real compute hours rather than extrapolate from a tiny demo. I would evaluate connection handling, wake-up behavior and restore requirements before choosing a production plan. The current pricing page also offers backend services beyond Postgres, but those have separate usage allowances. Keep the database estimate explicit, then add storage history, network traffic and any other services instead of treating one headline example as the complete bill.

Fit and limits

Fit and limits

Consider it for

Developers needing Postgres preview branches or variable, intermittent database workloads.

Check before committing

Paid compute and storage meter from zero; free quotas do not carry into paid plans. History, branches, egress and backend services can add cost.

What the documentation confirms

What the documentation confirms

  • Postgres compute can autoscale and scale to zero when inactive.
  • Branches, read replicas and pooled connections are documented platform features.
  • Free now includes 100 projects, each with 1 GB database storage and 100 CU-hours/month.

Selected official documents read 9 October 2026. Access can depend on plan, region and account.

Price and billing scope

Selected official price observations · read 9 October 2026 · currency and billing basis as shown
Plan or chargeObserved priceBilling, allowance and limits
Free$0 within Free project allowancesPer-project quotas, scale-to-zero and free-plan limits apply. 100 projects; each gets 100 CU-hours/month and 1 GB database storage. Official source ↗
Launch compute$0.106/CU-hour on LaunchCU size × active hours. Storage, history, network and other services are separate. Postgres compute only; no monthly minimum on current paid plans. Official source ↗
Paid database storage$0.35/GB-month for database storageSeparate from compute and history storage. Launch/Scale database storage. Official source ↗
Scale compute$0.222/CU-hour on ScaleUsage rate, not a fixed monthly subscription. Scale Postgres compute; advanced production scope. Official source ↗

These are selected published charges, not a complete account bill. Check eligibility, tax, add-ons and the price shown for your account before paying.

Recorded editorial criteria

Recorded editorial criteria

These are the previously recorded editorial opinions used in the directory. They have no individually recorded assessment date and were not rescored during this documentation refresh. They are not product-test results.

Historical recorded opinion · equal five-criterion rubric
Functionality9/10
Pricing value9/10
Ease of use9/10
Reliability8/10
Founder fit9/10
How criteria are presented →

Try one complete task

Create a small application database, branch it for a migration preview, run the change and restore it. Measure active CU-hours and inspect connection behavior after an idle interval.

Create a trial worksheet →

Compare requirements

Edited by Clinton Feyisitan · Evidence policy · Suggest a correction