Consider it for
Teams coordinating repeatable cross-functional projects and incoming work requests.
Project Management · Written evaluation
Asana
Work management system connecting tasks, project schedules, requests and team goals.
Plan at a glance
Plans & sources ↓Personal: Free. 2 people · unlimited tasks and projects · 100 MB/file
Limits to check
Personal projects for one or two people. Time tracking is via integrations; their free eligibility and limits were not verified.
Plans & limits to check
Personal projects for one or two people. Time tracking is via integrations; their free eligibility and limits were not verified. Paid quotes not verified in this check.
| Plan | Cost & billing | Allowance | Limits & date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Personal | Free | 2 people · unlimited tasks and projects · 100 MB/file | Personal projects for one or two people. Time tracking is via integrations; their free eligibility and limits were not verified. Price/access source read 2026-10-26 |
Official source 1 ↗ · Dated source receipt
Review scope: selected official documentation. No hands-on test or renewal of unrelated paid prices.
Official sources read 9 October 2026. The evaluation below is editorial judgement based on documentation; no hands-on product test was performed.
Research scope & testing evidence
Earlier pricing observations & sources
Price and billing scope
Official pricing ↗Source read · USD
Visible annual plan cards and matching USD structured offers. No monthly-billing or whole-team quote.
- PersonalFree
For one or two people; unlimited tasks/projects; 100 MB per file.
- StarterUSD 10.99/user/month equivalent
Billed annually; annual invoice/tax and minimum account seats not established.
- AdvancedUSD 24.99/user/month equivalent
Billed annually; annual invoice/tax and minimum account seats not established.
- Enterprise / Enterprise+Contact sales
Custom access and contract.
Two free users is an access limit, not a recommendation or measured collaboration test. Source receipt.
Our evaluation
Asana fits work that repeatedly passes between people and needs an explicit owner, deadline and approval. Its value comes from a shared operating habit: requests enter through a form, become tasks with enough context, and move through an agreed process. Adding portfolios before teams keep individual projects current will only aggregate unreliable status. The plan boundary matters because a simple task list, a scheduled dependency chain and cross-project capacity planning require different tiers. Start with one real handoff where work currently disappears, and make completion criteria visible. If the team already has another authoritative task system, decide which one owns each record before adding syncs; two competing status fields create more work than a new view removes.
Fit and limits
Fit and limits
Check before committing
Personal currently supports two users. Portfolio and resource-planning features require higher tiers; adoption still needs process ownership.
What the documentation confirms
What the documentation confirms
- Starter adds Timeline/Gantt, custom fields, forms and automation.
- Advanced includes portfolios, goals, resource management and approvals.
- Forms map incoming requests into project tasks and sections.
Selected official documents read 9 October 2026. Access can depend on plan, region and account.
Recorded editorial criteria
Recorded editorial criteria
These are the previously recorded editorial opinions used in the directory. They have no individually recorded assessment date and were not rescored during this documentation refresh. They are not product-test results.
| Functionality | 8/10 |
|---|---|
| Pricing value | 7/10 |
| Ease of use | 8/10 |
| Reliability | 9/10 |
| Founder fit | 7/10 |
Try one complete task
Build one request form feeding a ten-task project with owners, due dates and a dependency. Submit a sample request, move it through review and approval, then check that a colleague can find the next action without a meeting.
Create a trial worksheet →Compare requirements
Edited by Clinton Feyisitan · Evidence policy · Suggest a correction