Two automation platforms. One is cheaper and more powerful. The other is easier to learn. Here's the honest breakdown.
For solo builders who need complex automations, Make gives you 10x the operations at a fraction of the cost. If you just need simple zaps and hate visual complexity, Zapier is fine, but you'll pay for it.
Visual automation platform with powerful branching and logic
The OG automation tool, simple triggers and actions
| Feature | Make | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Builder | Flowchart-style, branching | Linear step-by-step |
| Branching Logic | Built-in routers & filters | Limited, paths are a paid add-on |
| Error Handling | Advanced, retry, break, ignore | Basic retry |
| HTTP Requests | Full HTTP module, any API | Webhooks by Zapier |
| Data Transformation | Built-in functions, JSON, arrays | Limited formatting options |
| Integrations | 1,500+ apps | 6,000+ apps |
| Learning Curve | Steeper, visual complexity | Easy, anyone can use it |
| Scheduling | Down to 1-minute intervals | 15-minute minimum (free), 1-min (paid) |
| Webhooks | Free on all plans | Premium feature |
| Team Collaboration | Organizations with roles | Better team management |
This is where it gets wild. Make counts operations (each step in a flow). Zapier counts tasks (each successful run). A 5-step automation uses 5 operations on Make but only 1 task on Zapier. Sounds like Zapier wins, until you see the prices.
Translation: Even with Make's operation counting, you get roughly 2-5x more automations per dollar. At scale, Make is dramatically cheaper.
For indie builders and startups, Make is the better investment. You get more power, more flexibility, and dramatically lower costs. The learning curve is real, budget an afternoon to learn the visual builder, but it pays off immediately when you're not hitting Zapier's task limits or paying for premium features that are free on Make.
If you're automating for a team of non-technical people and need maximum simplicity, Zapier still has its place. But for builders who want automation that scales? Make.
Significantly. Make's free tier includes 1,000 operations/month (vs Zapier's 100 tasks). Paid plans start at $9/month for 10,000 operations on Make, while Zapier charges $19.99/month for just 750 tasks. For high-volume automations, Make can be 5-10x cheaper.
Yes, slightly. Make uses a visual scenario builder with modules, routers, and filters, it's more powerful but takes time to learn. Zapier's linear trigger → action format is simpler. Budget an afternoon to learn Make's interface; after that, it's actually easier for complex workflows.
Almost. Make supports 1,000+ app integrations and can handle anything from simple automations to complex multi-branch workflows. Zapier has more niche integrations (6,000+ apps), so if you need a very specific app connector, check Make's integration list first.
There's no automated migration tool, but recreating workflows in Make is straightforward. Most Zapier triggers and actions have Make equivalents. The visual builder actually makes complex Zaps easier to understand when rebuilt as Make scenarios.
If a non-technical team member needs to set up simple automations, Zapier. If the person setting up automations is comfortable with visual tools and you want to save money, Make. For growing businesses with increasing automation needs, Make scales much more affordably.
Tell us what you are building and we will pick the right tool for you. Or if you are ready to switch, we can help you move without breaking things.
Free. No signup required.
Want someone to choose for you?
Get a Decision Memo (£29) →Personalised recommendation with rationale, based on your use case.
